WWW.ESCULENT.CO.UK



Credit where credits is due.

David Cameron speaking on the Scottish Governments
much hated ‘Named Person scheme.’

Cameron has certainly got this one right. How humiliating it must be for the overwhelming numbers of parents who love their children far more and anyone else could possibly love them, to be forced to allow someone else to call the shots regarding their welfare. Still, as many others have pointed-out it is just another step towards the globalist policy of breaking-up the family unit, until nobody has any allegiances that might interfere with their allegiance to ‘The Beast System’.

Revelation 13:16-17
16 - He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads,
17 - and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

They shall want your total allegiance.

Matthew 10:21-22
21 - “Now brother will deliver up brother to death, and a father his child; and children will rise up against parents and cause them to be put to death.
22 - And you will be hated by all for My name’s sake. But he who endures to the end will be saved”.

As Abraham’s faith in God’s promises [Gen 15:6] was perfected [James 2:22] by works [Gen 22:12] so Christians are going to be forced to make the same choice, that they might be accounted among them that have the ‘Faith of Abraham’ being the children of Abraham by faith, and so heirs to the promises.

Romans 4:16
Therefore it is of faith that it might be according to grace, so that the promise might be sure to all the seed, not only to those who are of the law, but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all

Parents: ‘Our children’s safety put at risk by state intrusion’.
- Article by the Christian Institute.

The poll also showed almost six in ten people (57 per cent) do not think it is right for every child to be assigned a State official to monitor their wellbeing, whether their parents want one or not.

In addition, 64 per cent of parents believe that assigning a named person to every child, whether vulnerable or not, “is an unacceptable intrusion into family life”. Just one in five (19 per cent) disagreed.


Another example of the state trumping parents.

State Parenting trumps all.

ref-0107